And it is not being understood as such by its advocates and their fellow travelers because of a potent combination of two factors: First, people’s fears of being labeled bigots, and second, a genuine and commendable effort to extend compassion and care to a very small minority. But by doing so, it becomes nothing less than an assault on what it means to be a woman. This is an audacious form of woman-hatred, especially since it comes in the guise of opening up womanhood, of extending its benefits to all. And it casts everything that has come before as suspect: All forms of social organization and every idea that denies this movement’s claims have been deemed retrogressive and actively harmful to the forward march of greater rights for all. The misogynistic nature of this revolution has escaped proper scrutiny precisely because it is understood as progressive-as literally better than everything that has come before. Anyone should have the right to call themselves a woman. Under the dictates of this new dispensation, anyone, regardless of physiology, must be allowed to lay claim to the biological realities of the female body. And in doing so, they are treating womanhood itself-the defining feature of half of humankind-as though it is a disposable commodity. Its advocates believe they are ushering in a world in which one can be whomever one chooses to be. It comes in the guise of a liberationist philosophy, a transformational movement dedicated to open-mindedness. A new form of misogyny is taking hold in contemporary culture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |